![]() Only build a limited amount of functionality into MapInfo Professionalīut a community like MI-L has almost unlimited ability to create and shareįor free. Main reasons we made MapBasic free is so that more people like you wouldĬreate utilities, useful code snippets, etc. It was easier to sell the company than to face those problems, perhaps? Out of MI-ordinary caused huge angst in the user community over several NET version of MI (exceptįor MapXtreme), but obviously the possible appearance of MI.NET and phasing I guess I'm a bit dark on the abandonment of a. More recent releases of MI is through calling the MI tools. ![]() To an extent, the functionality that is achieved by MBX targeting the Rather than to supplement or augment users' abilities via the user communityĪlthough MI is advancing, MB the language and its functionality really I guess the thinking is to maximize upgrading from older MI versions to MI9, To making a "less-than-MB9" (ie MB8.5 or 7.8 or whatever) available at a low Low-cost runtime for MI is also made available. I think it's a poor business decision to make MB9 available free, andĮxclude its use by those who have earlier versions of MI - unless a very (So it is an easy one to add to Jacques Paris' excellent comparative ![]() The MB9 WhatsNew document is probably sufficient.Īpart from a lot of time/date stuff, in MB9 there are only a few commandsįor which there are new clauses - and not much else. > to avoid if one will be stuck with MIPro 8.5 for the A user compiled list of what functions / procedure calls ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |